Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetScope
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Ethermac View
Date:2025-04-06 12:39:34
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- How Kate Middleton’s Ring Is a Nod to Early Years of Prince William Romance
- Will the attacks on Walz’s military service stick like they did to Kerry 20 years ago?
- Tyreek Hill criticizes Noah Lyles, says he would beat Olympian in a race
- Trump's 'stop
- Scott Peterson Breaks Silence on “Horrible” Affair Before Wife Laci Peterson’s Murder
- Grant Ellis named the new Bachelor following his elimination from 'The Bachelorette'
- Hoda Kotb Shares Outlook on Her Dating Life Moving Forward
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Grant Ellis named the new Bachelor following his elimination from 'The Bachelorette'
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- As Olympic flag lands in Los Angeles, pressure turns up for 2028 Summer Games
- Ex-Cornell student sentenced to 21 months for making antisemitic threats
- Have a $2 bill hanging around? It could be worth thousands of dollars
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Will the attacks on Walz’s military service stick like they did to Kerry 20 years ago?
- Maryland extends the contract of athletic director Damon Evans through June 2029
- Tyreek Hill criticizes Noah Lyles, says he would beat Olympian in a race
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
Why Are the Starliner Astronauts Still in Space: All the Details on a Mission Gone Awry
Connecticut Republicans pick candidates to take on 2 veteran Democrats in Congress
Paige DeSorbo Shares Surprising Update on Filming Summer House With Pregnant Lindsay Hubbard & Carl Radke
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
'Unbelievably good ending': 89-year-old missing hiker recovered after almost 10 days
'QUEEEEEN': Raygun of Olympics breakdancing fame spotted busting moves, gains fan in Adele
Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds mark first married couple to top box office in 34 years