Current:Home > InvestNovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center:US appeals court to decide if Pennsylvania mail-in ballots with wrong date still count -AssetScope
NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center:US appeals court to decide if Pennsylvania mail-in ballots with wrong date still count
Indexbit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 01:20:01
PHILADELPHIA (AP) — JA federal appeals court must decide if Pennsylvania voters need to put accurate handwritten dates on NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Centerthe outside envelopes of their mail-in ballots for the votes to count, a dispute with implications for this year’s presidential contest.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held oral arguments in Philadelphia Tuesday over a district judge’s ruling in November that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if they are received in time.
Ari Savitzky, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union representing several voter groups, told the court that more than 10,000 ballots in Pennsylvania were disqualified in 2022 based on what he called “a meaningless paperwork error.” He argued that the “materiality provision” of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was designed to prevent that.
“An immaterial mistake on a piece of paperwork doesn’t go to the deficiency or validity of the ballot itself,” he argued before the three-judge panel.
U.S. Circuit Judge Cindy K. Chung, who was appointed to the bench by President Joe Biden, asked where judges should draw the line between meaningless and material errors that can render the ballots invalid.
“Is there a difference between non-compliance — where you totally leave off the date — and imperfect compliance, where you have the date but you got the year wrong?” she asked.
Lawyer John M. Gore, representing state and national Republican groups challenging a district court ruling last year, said “the right to vote is not denied” when the state qualifies someone to vote, sends them a ballot and then rejects the ballot “because they failed to follow Pennsylvania law.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans under an expansion of mail-in ballots enacted in 2019. Republican lawmakers agreed to the change in exchange for an end to “straight-party voting” that they saw as a longtime Democratic advantage. In 2022, about 1.2 million Pennsylvanians voted by mail.
When the COVID-19 pandemic began, the consequences of the expanded mail-in ballot rules became more pronounced, and the partisan vote-by-mail gap was widened by President Donald Trump’s opposition to mail-in ballots during his failed 2020 reelection campaign.
U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, a Trump appointee, ruled last year that county boards of election may no longer reject mail ballots that lack accurate, handwritten dates on their return envelopes. She said the date — mandated by state law — is irrelevant in helping elections officials decide whether the ballot was received in time or whether the voter is qualified to cast a ballot.
The Pennsylvania groups challenging the date mandate argue it allows the state to disenfranchise voter over meaningless mistakes, violating provisions of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964. The suit was filed by state chapters of the NAACP, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, the Black Political Empowerment Project and other groups.
Baxter said elections officials do not use the date on the outer envelope to determine whether the vote should be counted.
“The important date for casting the ballot is the date the ballot is received. Here, the date on the outside envelope was not used by any of the county boards to determine when a voter’s mail ballot was received in the November 2022 election,” Baxter wrote.
___
Scolforo reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
veryGood! (26)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Alabama Town That Fought Coal Ash Landfill Wins Settlement
- See pictures and videos of the Canadian wildfires and their impact across the planet
- In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 2)
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Taylor Swift Totally Swallowed a Bug During Her Eras Tour Stop in Chicago
- The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
- What is the Higher Education Act —and could it still lead to student loan forgiveness?
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Could Climate Change Spark a Financial Crisis? Candidates Warn Fed It’s a Risk
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Melissa Gorga Reveals Bombshell RHONJ Reunion Receipt in Attack on A--hole Teresa Giudice
- Elliot Page Shares Update on Dating Life After Transition Journey
- Environmental Justice Bill Fails to Pass in California
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- U.S. hostage envoy says call from Paul Whelan after Brittney Griner's release was one of the toughest he's ever had
- New Details Revealed About Wild 'N Out Star Jacky Oh's Final Moments
- Elliot Page Shares Update on Dating Life After Transition Journey
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
The Ultimatum’s Xander Shares What’s Hard to Watch Back in Vanessa Relationship
Jill Duggar Was Ready to Testify Against Brother Josh Duggar in Child Pornography Case
Energy Production Pushing Water Supply to Choke Point
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
Carbon Markets Pay Off for These States as New Businesses, Jobs Spring Up
How Much Does Climate Change Cost? Biden Raises Carbon’s Dollar Value, but Not by Nearly Enough, Some Say