Current:Home > reviews2nd Circuit rejects Donald Trump’s request to halt postconviction proceedings in hush money case -AssetScope
2nd Circuit rejects Donald Trump’s request to halt postconviction proceedings in hush money case
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:58:02
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has rejected Donald Trump’s request to halt postconviction proceedings in his hush money criminal case, leaving a key ruling and the former president’s sentencing on track for after the November election.
A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan cited the postponement last week of Trump’s sentencing from Sept. 18 to Nov. 26 in denying his motion for an emergency stay.
The sentencing delay, which Trump had sought, removed the urgency required for the appeals court to consider pausing proceedings.
Messages seeking comment were left for Trump’s lawyers and the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted the case.
Trump appealed to the 2nd Circuit after a federal judge last week thwarted the Republican nominee’s request to have the U.S. District Court in Manhattan seize control of the case from the state court where it was tried.
Trump’s lawyers said they wanted the case moved to federal court so they could then seek to have the verdict and case dismissed on immunity grounds.
The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, announced the delay last Friday and said he now plans to rule Nov. 12 on Trump’s request to overturn the verdict and toss out the case because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s July presidential immunity ruling.
Merchan explained that he was postponing the sentencing to avoid any appearance that the proceeding “has been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching presidential election in which the Defendant is a candidate.”
Trump was convicted in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 presidential election. Trump denies Daniels’ claim that she and Trump had a sexual encounter a decade earlier and says he did nothing wrong.
Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years behind bars. Other potential sentences include probation, a fine or a conditional discharge, which would require Trump to stay out of trouble to avoid additional punishment.
veryGood! (68)
Related
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Fernanda Ramirez Is “Obsessed With” This Long-Lasting, Non-Sticky Lip Gloss
- Meet the 'financial hype woman' who wants you to talk about money
- BuzzFeed shutters its newsroom as the company undergoes layoffs
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Who bears the burden, and how much, when religious employees refuse Sabbath work?
- Pete Davidson’s New Purchase Proves He’s Already Thinking About Future Kids
- BuzzFeed shutters its newsroom as the company undergoes layoffs
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- First raise the debt limit. Then we can talk about spending, the White House insists
Ranking
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Why Did California Regulators Choose a Firm with Ties to Chevron to Study Irrigating Crops with Oil Wastewater?
- Despite GOP Gains in Virginia, the State’s Landmark Clean Energy Law Will Be Hard to Derail
- There's No Crying Over These Secrets About A League of Their Own
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Inside Clean Energy: Taking Stock of the Energy Storage Boom Happening Right Now
- Biden Could Score a Climate Victory in a Single Word: Plastics
- Sue Johanson, Sunday Night Sex Show Host, Dead at 93
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Where Are Interest Rates Going?
Twitter removes all labels about government ties from NPR and other outlets
Carbon Capture Takes Center Stage, But Is Its Promise an Illusion?
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
The Fate of Protected Wetlands Are At Stake in the Supreme Court’s First Case of the Term
How One Native American Tribe is Battling for Control Over Flaring