Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -AssetScope
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-15 15:32:59
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- What is 'Ozempic face'? How we refer to weight-loss side effects matters.
- Fontes blocked from using new rule to certify election results when counties refuse to
- College football Week 5 grades: Ole Miss RB doubles as thespian; cheerleader's ninja move
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Indigenous Group Asks SEC to Scrutinize Fracking Companies Operating in Argentina
- What time is the new 'SNL' tonight? Season 50 premiere date, cast, host, where to watch
- A brush fire prompts evacuations in the Gila River Indian Community southwest of Phoenix
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Anna Delvey tells Tori Spelling she's not 'some abuser' after shared 'DWTS' eliminations
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Lynx star Napheesa Collier wins WNBA Defensive Player of the Year, tops all-defensive team
- Ryan Williams vs Jeremiah Smith: Does Alabama or Ohio State have nation's best freshman WR?
- Horoscopes Today, September 28, 2024
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- At least 64 dead after Helene’s deadly march across the Southeast
- 'Days of Our Lives' icon Drake Hogestyn, beloved as John Black, dies at 70
- These women thought you had to be skinny to have style. Weight gain proved them wrong
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
In the Fight to Decide the Fate of US Steel, Climate and Public Health Take a Backseat to Politics
Ariana Grande Slams Rumors About Ethan Slater Relationship
Map shows 19 states affected by listeria outbreak tied to Boar's Head deli meat
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
The 26 Most Popular Amazon Products This Month: Double Chin Masks, $1 Lipstick, Slimming Jumpsuits & More
Wyoming considers slight change to law allowing wolves to be killed with vehicles
New rules regarding election certification in Georgia to get test in court