Current:Home > ScamsNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -AssetScope
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
View
Date:2025-04-12 14:05:32
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Climate Change Will Increase Risk of Violent Conflict, Researchers Warn
- Save 30% On Spanx Shorts and Step up Your Spring Style With These Top-Sellers
- This Week in Clean Economy: Dueling Solyndra Ads Foreshadow Energy-Centric Campaign
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Becky Sauerbrunn, U.S. Women's National Team captain, to miss World Cup with injury
- 'Back to one meal a day': SNAP benefits drop as food prices climb
- Get Your Wallets Ready for Angelina Jolie's Next Venture
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Mexico's leader denies his country's role in fentanyl crisis. Republicans are furious
Ranking
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- What's closed and what's open on Juneteenth 2023
- Can Energy-Efficient Windows Revive U.S. Glass Manufacturing?
- Federal judge in Texas hears case that could force a major abortion pill off market
- Trump's 'stop
- Strawberry products sold at Costco, Trader Joe's, recalled after hepatitis A outbreak
- 80-hour weeks and roaches near your cot? More medical residents unionize
- Vanderpump Rules' James Kennedy Addresses Near-Physical Reunion Fight With Tom Sandoval
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
Coasts Should Plan for 6.5 Feet Sea Level Rise by 2100 as Precaution, Experts Say
In Alaska’s Cook Inlet, Another Apparent Hilcorp Natural Gas Leak
How Taylor Lautner Grew Out of His Resentment Towards Twilight Fame
The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
This Week in Clean Economy: New Report Puts Solyndra Media Coverage in Spotlight
FDA gives 2nd safety nod to cultivated meat, produced without slaughtering animals
Can Energy-Efficient Windows Revive U.S. Glass Manufacturing?